Skip to main content
. 2016 May 18;11:74. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0430-6

Table 3.

Percent of CRUZA parishes that implemented EBS for cancer control by intervention condition, final (n = 31)

Strategy Capacity enhancement (%) (n = 20) Standard dissemination (%) (n = 11) p value
Small mediaa 90 64 0.038*
Group educationb 60 36 0.104
Client remindersc 65 55 0.284
Reduction of structural barriersd 45 55 0.305
One-to-one educatione 70 64 0.359

aThe Z-Score is 1.7777. The p-value is 0.03754. The proportion of Yes or No responses for Observation 1 is 0.9. The proportion for Observation 2 is 0.636

bThe Z-Score is 1.26. The p-value is 0.10383. The proportion of Yes or No responses for Observation 1 is 0.6. The proportion for Observation 2 is 0.364

cThe Z-Score is 0.5718. The p-value is 0.28434. The proportion of Yes or No responses for Observation 1 is 0.65. The proportion for Observation 2 is 0.545

dThe Z-Score is -0.5088. The p-value is 0.30503. The proportion of Yes or No responses for Observation 1 is 0.45. The proportion for Observation 2 is 0.545

eThe Z-Score is 0.3627. The p-value is 0.35942.The proportion of Yes or No responses for Observation 1 is 0.7. The proportion for Observation 2 is 0.636

*p-value compares Capacity Enhancement to Standard Dissemination conditions