Table 3.
Percent of CRUZA parishes that implemented EBS for cancer control by intervention condition, final (n = 31)
| Strategy | Capacity enhancement (%) (n = 20) | Standard dissemination (%) (n = 11) | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Small mediaa | 90 | 64 | 0.038* |
| Group educationb | 60 | 36 | 0.104 |
| Client remindersc | 65 | 55 | 0.284 |
| Reduction of structural barriersd | 45 | 55 | 0.305 |
| One-to-one educatione | 70 | 64 | 0.359 |
aThe Z-Score is 1.7777. The p-value is 0.03754. The proportion of Yes or No responses for Observation 1 is 0.9. The proportion for Observation 2 is 0.636
bThe Z-Score is 1.26. The p-value is 0.10383. The proportion of Yes or No responses for Observation 1 is 0.6. The proportion for Observation 2 is 0.364
cThe Z-Score is 0.5718. The p-value is 0.28434. The proportion of Yes or No responses for Observation 1 is 0.65. The proportion for Observation 2 is 0.545
dThe Z-Score is -0.5088. The p-value is 0.30503. The proportion of Yes or No responses for Observation 1 is 0.45. The proportion for Observation 2 is 0.545
eThe Z-Score is 0.3627. The p-value is 0.35942.The proportion of Yes or No responses for Observation 1 is 0.7. The proportion for Observation 2 is 0.636
*p-value compares Capacity Enhancement to Standard Dissemination conditions