Skip to main content
. 2016 May 18;11(5):e0155604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155604

Table 2. Effect of naltrexone on other measures of the rGT for the Optimal (n = 15) and Suboptimal (n = 9) groups.

Dose X Group ANOVAs revealed no significant interactions or main effects. Data presented are mean ± SEM. *Indicated a main effect of Group (p<0.05).

VARIABLE GROUP DOSES (mg/kg)
  Vehicle 1 3 10
Trials Optimal* 89.55 ± 6.11 93.96 ± 8.62 97.88 ± 7.85 90.1 ± 7.43
Suboptimal 64.89 ± 3.07 66.34 ± 4.24 72.13 ± 5.80 71.9 ± 8.99
Omissions Optimal 0.97 ± 0.35 0.81 ± 0.39 1.89 ± 1.70 1.02 ± 0.60
Suboptimal 2.16 ± 1.14 2.12 ± 1.47 2.98 ± 1.62 2.22 ± 1.28
Premature Responding Optimal 12.92 ± 1.91 10.52 ± 1.52 8.46 ± 1.58 10.28 ± 1.68
Suboptimal 13.17 ± 3.42 15.87 ± 4.08 12.20 ± 3.17 19.01 ± 3.97
Reward Perseverative Optimal .020 ± .01 .021 ± .01 .012 ± .01 .011 ± .003
  Suboptimal .014 ± .01 .032 ± .02 .014 ± .01
.010 ± .004
Punishment Perseverative Optimal .051 ± .01 .051 ± .01 .048 ± .01 .058 ± .01
Suboptimal .032 ± .01 .044 ± .01 .039 ± .01 .042 ± .01
Choice Latency Optimal 1.38 ± .35 1.39 ± .19 1.27 ± .14 1.37 ± .20
Suboptimal 0.93 ± .28 1.21 ± .21 1.28 ± .20 1.14 ± .22
Collect Latency Optimal 1.76 ± .11 1.80 ± .16 1.64 ± .10 1.73 ± .13
Suboptimal 1.64 ± .21 1.37 ± .09 1.41 ± .08 1.94 ± .65