Skip to main content
. 2016 May 18;11(5):e0155607. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155607

Table 4. Hierarchical regression analyses for psychosocial resources predicting depression.

Variables Step 1(β) Step 2(β) Step 3(β)
Model 1 Model 2 Model 1 Model 2
Covariates
    Age 0.014 0.006 0.018 0.036 0.040
    Gender 0.038 0.048 0.049 0.048 0.049
    Education1 0.145** 0.052 0.052 0.019 0.016
    Education2 0.171** 0.105* 0.113* 0.027 0.029
    Time since diagnosis -0.123** -0.053 -0.048 -0.020 -0.016
    Cancer stage 0.076 0.048 0.045 0.038 0.036
Predictors (external)
    Perceived social support -0.378*** -0.127**
    Perceived social support-others - -
    Perceived social support-family -0.384*** -0.143**
    Perceived social support-friend - -
Predictors (internal)
    Hope -0.077 -0.076
    Optimism -0.304*** -0.301***
    Resilience -0.244*** -0.241***
F 4.544*** 15.389*** 15.770*** 27.116*** 27.507***
R2 0.054 0.183 0.187 0.362 0.365
Adj.R2 0.042 0.171 0.175 0.349 0.352
R2-changes 0.054 0.129 0.133 0.179 0.179

β = standardized regression coefficient; Education1 = Middle school or below vs. Junior college or above; Education2 = High school vs. Junior college or above; Adj.R2 = adjusted R2.

* p < 0.05

** p < 0.01

*** p < 0.001

There were two models (Model 1 and Model 2) in Step 2. Total score of social support was added in Model 1, and three subscales (i.e., others, friend and family) were added in Model 2 adjusted by the stepwise regression due to the high correlations among the MSPSS subscales