Table 2.
Effect sizes of low HDL-C and high HDL-C in conjunction with varying levels of TG and LDL-C*
Low HDL-C | High HDL-C | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | OR | CI | N | OR | CI | ||
TG<100, LDL<100 | 84 | TG<100, LDL<100 | 388 | 0.6 | (0.5-0.7) | ||
TG<100, LDL>=100 | 300 | 1.3 | (1.0-1.6) | TG<100, LDL>=100 | 1098 | 0.7 | (0.5-1.0) |
TG>=100,LDL<100 | 137 | 1.3 | (1.1-1.5) | TG>=100,LDL<100 | 72 | 0.7 | (0.6-1.0) |
TG>=100,LDL>=100 | 853 | 1.6 | (1.2-2.2) | TG>=100,LDL>=100 | 658 | 0.9 | (0.7-1.4) |
TG<100, LDL<130 | 213 | TG<100, LDL<130 | 929 | 0.6 | (0.5-0.7) | ||
TG<100, LDL>=130 | 171 | 1.3 | (1.1-1.5) | TG<100, LDL>=130 | 557 | 0.7 | (0.6-1.0) |
TG>=100,LDL<130 | 414 | 1.3 | (1.0-1.5) | TG>=100,LDL<130 | 255 | 0.7 | (0.5-1.0) |
TG>=100,LDL>=130 | 576 | 1.6 | (1.3-2.0) | TG>=100,LDL>=130 | 475 | 0.9 | (0.7-1.3) |
TG<150, LDL<100 | 133 | TG<150, LDL<100 | 434 | 0.6 | (0.5-0.7) | ||
TG<150, LDL>=100 | 660 | 1.3 | (1.0-1.7) | TG<150, LDL>=100 | 1531 | 0.7 | (0.5-1.0) |
TG>=150,LDL<100 | 88 | 1.2 | (1.0-1.5) | TG>=150,LDL<100 | 26 | 0.7 | (0.5-1.0) |
TG>=150,LDL>=100 | 493 | 1.6 | (1.2-2.2) | TG>=150,LDL>=100 | 225 | 0.9 | (0.6-1.3) |
TG<150, LDL<130 | 367 | TG<150, LDL<130 | 1095 | 0.6 | (0.5-0.7) | ||
TG<150, LDL>=130 | 426 | 1.3 | (1.1-1.6) | TG<150, LDL>=130 | 870 | 0.8 | (0.6-1.0) |
TG>=150,LDL<130 | 260 | 1.2 | (1.0-1.5 | TG>=150,LDL<130 | 89 | 0.7 | (0.5-1.0) |
TG>=150,LDL>=130 | 321 | 1.6 | (1.2-2.1) | TG>=150,LDL>=130 | 162 | 0.9 | (0.6-1.3) |
adjusted for age, sex, T2DM, SBP, smoking status, menopausal status & LLT.