Table 2.

Study 1: Comparison of the hypothesized model and alternative models.

Model	χ2(N = 244)	df	CFI	TLI	RMSEA	Δχ2(N = 244)	AIC	BIC
2 × 2 Model	101.35	48	0.95	0.93	0.07		7895.85	8041.86
Undiff. model	649.37**	54	0.39	0.25	0.22	548.02**	8485.90	8611.05
Valence	563.74**	53	0.48	0.35	0.20	462.39**	8411.05	8539.68
Definition	309.88**	53	0.74	0.67	0.14	208.53**	8127.75	8256.38
Trichotomous A	240.51**	51	0.81	0.75	0.13	139.16**	8045.92	8181.50
Trichotomous B	198.67**	51	0.95	0.80	0.11	97.32**	8002.20	8137.78

CFI, comparative fit index; TLI, Tucker–Lewis index; RMSEA, root-mean-square error of approximation; AIC, Akaike information criterion; BIC, Bayesian information criterion; Undiff, Undifferentiated.

^**p < 0.01.