Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 7;34(6):557–565. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.0830

Table 2.

Mean Quality-of-Life Changes From Baseline at 6 Months

Patients N* STAR (n = 277) Usual Care
(n = 180) P (Univariable)† P (Multivariable)† Effect Size
Evaluable patients* 457
EQ-5D at baseline 86.2 (84.7 to 87.7) 86.6 (84.7 to 88.5)
EQ-5D at 6 months 84.8 (83.2 to 86.4) 79.5 (76.7 to 82.2)
 Point drop from baseline 1.4 (0.4 to 3.1) 7.1 (4.8 to 9.5)
 Difference in point drop between arms 5.7 <.001 <.001 0.37
Subgroup analysis
 Computer-inexperienced subgroup* 116
  EQ-5D at baseline 83.6 (80.2 to 86.9) 86.9 (81.9 to 91.9)
  EQ-5D at 6 months 81.8 (78.2 to 85.3) 78.6 (71.2 to 86.0)
   Point drop from baseline 1.8 ( to 2.1 to 5.7) 8.3 (3.6 to 13.1)
   Difference in point drop between arms 6.5 .06 .11 0.38
 Computer-experienced subgroup* 341
  EQ-5D at baseline 87.3 (85.7 to 88.6) 86.5 (84.5 to 88.6)
  EQ-5D at 6 months 86.1 (84.3 to 87.8) 79.7 (76.7 to 82.7)
   Point drop from baseline 1.2 (0.7 to 3.1) 6.9 (4.2 to 9.5)
   Difference in point drop between arms 5.7 <.001 <.001 0.38

NOTE. Data presented as mean (95% CI) unless otherwise noted.

Abbreviations: STAR, Symptom Tracking and Reporting web-based self-reporting system; EQ-5D, EuroQoL EQ-5D quality of life questionnaire.

*

Patents without postbaseline EQ-5D scores were not included in the primary health-related quality of life analysis but were included in the sensitivity analysis with similar results.

P values for between-arm comparisons. Multivariable analyses controlled for age, sex, cancer type, race, and education level. For overall analyses, subgroup assignment (computer experienced or computer inexperienced) was also included as a covariate.