Fig. 2. Allograft rejection in adoptive hosts of CD8 TCM and TEM.
Sorted CD8 TCM (1.5 × 106 – 2 × 106) or TEM (0.4 × 106 – 0.6 × 106) containing similar numbers of BALB/c-reactive IFNγ+ T cells were transferred into wt and aly/aly-spleen adoptive hosts followed by BALB/c-skin transplantation 2-days later. (A) Skin allograft rejection mediated by CD8 TCM and TEM in wt hosts. BALB/c-skin allograft survival was tested in wt recipients of CD8 TCM or TEM and compared to unimmunized naïve mice (Naïve, no cells) and sensitized mice (Sensitized, no cells) harboring endogenous memory T cells that had rejected BALB/c-skin allografts 8 – 12 weeks earlier (n = 3 – 4 mice/grp). (B) Skin allograft rejection mediated by CD8 TCM and TEM in wt hosts treated with co-stimulation blockade. Wt recipients of CD8 TCM or CD8 TEM, unimmunized naïve mice (Naïve, no cells) and sensitized mice (Sensitized, no cells) were treated with CTLA4-Ig and anti-CD40L, 0.25mg each (i.p.), on day 0, 2, 4 and 6 after BALB/c-skin transplantation and allograft survival was compared (n = 4 – 6 mice/grp). (C) Skin allograft rejection mediated by CD8 TCM and TEM in aly/aly-spleen hosts. Aly/aly-spleen recipients of CD8 TCM or CD8 TEM or unfractionated CD8 memory T cells (1 × 106) (CD8 memory) and aly/aly-spleen naïve mice without memory T cell transfer (Naïve, no cells) underwent BALB/c-skin transplantation and allograft survival was compared (n = 4 – 7 mice/grp).