Skip to main content
. 2016 May 19;16:319. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2354-6

Table 2.

Demographics of randomized patients

Tamoxifen only group (B + D group, N = 655) Ovarian function suppression group (C + E group, N = 634) P-value
Age(mean, years) 39.7 ± 4.1 39.6 ± 4.1 0.580
Stage
 I 178 (27.2 %) 169 (26.7 %) 0.977
 II 335 (51.1 %) 332 (52.4 %)
 III 121 (18.5 %) 113 (17.8 %)
 Unidentified 21 (3.2 %) 20 (3.2 %)
Lymph node status
 Negative 279 (42.6 %) 275 (43.4 %) 0.927
 Positive 371 (56.6 %) 355 (56.0 %)
 Unidentified 5 (0.8 %) 4 (0.6 %)
Histology
 Invasive ductal carcinoma 573 (87.5 %) 560 (88.3 %) 0.917
 Invasive lobular carcinoma 32 (4.9 %) 26 (4.1 %)
 Others 42 (6.4 %) 41 (6.5 %)
 Unidentified 8 (1.2 %) 7 (1.1 %)
Histologic grade
 G1 95(14.5 %) 118 (18.6 %) 0.229
 G2 359 (54.8 %) 323 (50.9 %)
 G3 160 (24.4 %) 151 (23.8 %)
 Unidentified 41(6.3 %) 42 (6.6 %)
Chemotherapy regimen
 Anthracycline + cyclophosphamide 184 (28.1 %) 185 (29.2 %) 0.782
 Anthracycline + cyclophosphamide followed by taxane 324 (49.5 %) 318 (50.2 %)
 Anthracycline + taxane 30 (4.6 %) 29 (4.6 %)
 5-fluorouracil + anthracycline + cyclophosphamide 74 (11.3 %) 73(11.5 %)
 Others 21 (3.2 %) 14(2.2 %)
 Unidentified 22 (3.4 %) 15 (2.4 %)
Operation
 Total mastectomy 268 (40.9 %) 248 (39.1 %) 0.762
 Breast conserving surgery 382 (58.3 %) 382 (60.3 %)
 Unidentified 5 (0.8 %) 4 (0.6 %)