Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 23;6(2):e740. doi: 10.1038/tp.2016.6

Table 2. Illustration of included BPND data (±s.d.) from the largest cluster in each t-map.

  MIST 1MIST control cluster MIST 2MIST control cluster MIST 2MIST 1 cluster
d-Amphetamine subgroup
 BPND
  MIST control 1.5±0.64 2.18±0.39 2.44±0.47
  MIST 1 1.28±0.57 2.09±0.42 2.43±0.42
  MIST 2 1.33±0.78 1.92±0.45 2.21±0.45
 
 Delta BPND
  MIST 1–MIST control −14.95±14.24 −4.18±9.28 0.49±11.36
  MIST 2–MIST control −15.37±28.53 −10.1±20.85 −7.27±22.49
  MIST 2–MIST 1 −0.82±31.82 −5.72±23.17 −8±17.87
 
Placebo subgroup
 BPND
  MIST control 1.5±0.27 2.15±0.24 1.85±0.28
  MIST 1 1.29±0.21 2.01±0.24 1.95±0.17
  MIST 2 1.44±0.33 1.92±0.17 1.73±0.21
 
 Delta BPND
  MIST 1–MIST control −12.53±12.62 −6.61±6.41 6.79±13.9
  MIST 2–MIST control −4.1±13.19 −10.48±6.07 −5.86±9.82
  MIST 2–MIST 1 11.88±22.98 −3.78±8.71 −11.35±7.5

Abbreviations: BPND, non-displaceable binding potential; MIST, Montreal Imaging Stress Task.

As the clusters were identified on the basis of their significance, the BPND values extracted from those clusters are by definition statistically different. Those values that were used to generate the t-map are in bold.