Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 1;6(3):e745. doi: 10.1038/tp.2016.19

Table 3. Linear regression models of MTHFD1L rs11754661 for rumination score as an outcome variable, separately in Budapest and Manchester.

  Budapest
Manchester
  Predictor variable N Beta s.e. t P Predictor variable N Beta s.e. t P
Additive MTHFD1L rs11754661 862 0.158 0.054 2.915 0.004 MTHFD1L rs11754661 1258 0.095 0.046 2.049 0.041
  Age 862 0.004 0.002 2.417 0.016 Age 1258 0.008 0.002 4.693 <0.001
  Gender 862 0.220 0.034 6.409 <0.001 Gender 1258 0.311 0.037 8.456 <0.001
                         
Dominant MTHFD1L rs11754661 862 0.157 0.055 2.828 0.005 MTHFD1L rs11754661 1258 0.107 0.050 2.120 0.034
  Age 862 0.004 0.002 2.395 0.017 Age 1258 0.008 0.002 4.700 <0.001
  Gender 862 0.220 0.034 6.419 <0.001 Gender 1258 0.310 0.037 8.437 <0.001

PLINK linear regression equations were constructed with the predictor variables displayed in the rows. Additive and dominant models were run, separately in Budapest and Manchester; all with A as the minor allele. (Recessive models have not been run because of low number in AA groups.) Significant findings for MTHFD1L rs11754661 as a predictor variable are marked with bold.