Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Ind Med. 2015 Dec 17;59(3):236–244. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22547

Table II.

Workers’ Compensation Claims Rate* by Risk Class (Grooming and Other Services vs. Veterinary Clinics), 2007–2011, Washington State

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2007–2011
Compensable Claims
Claims Grooming, Count (Rate) 83 (396.0) 83 (381.6) 74 (341.8) 57 (255.9) 52 (222.5) 349 (317.2)
Veterinary Clinics, Count (Rate) 72 (145.5) 73 (141.6) 42 (81.2) 53 (102.0) 50 (93.3) 290 (112.3)
Claim Rate Ratio Grooming Rate/Vet Clinics, Rate Ratio (95% CI) 2.7 (2.0,3.7) 2.7 (2,3.7) 4.2 (2.9,6.2) 2.5 (1.7,3.7) 2.4 (1.6,3.5) 2.8 (2.4,3.3)
Accepted Claims
Claims Grooming , Count (Rate) 541 (2580.9) 498 (2289.4) 555 (2563.5) 448 (2010.9) 368 (1574.5) 2410 (2190.6)
Veterinary Clinics, Count (Rate) 786 (1587.9) 807 (1566.7) 707 (1367.3) 711 (1367.9) 830 (1548.0) 3841 (1486.8)
Claim Rate Ratio Grooming Rate/Vet Clinics, Rate Ratio (95% CI) 1.6 (1.5,1.8) 1.5 (1.3,1.6) 1.9 (1.7,2.1) 1.5 (1.3,1.7) 1.0 (0.9,1.2) 1.5 (1.4,1.6)
*

Claim rates per 10,000 full-time equivalent (FTE) employee; One FTE = 2000 hours.

Grooming and Other Services category represents Pet stores, Grooming, Shelters, and Kennels risk class

Assured all reportage percentages carried to at least one decimal place

Moved flag from rows to table title

Changed “Rate, estimate (lci, uci)” to “Rate ratio (95% CI)”