Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 12;11:648–657. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2016.04.005

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Regional comparison across the twenty patients for ten regions of interest. A) 18F-FDG PET/CT vs 18F-FDG PET/MR; B) ASL vs 18F-FDG PET/MR.