Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Appl Stat. 2016 Mar 25;10(1):418–450. doi: 10.1214/15-AOAS899

Table B8.

Comparison for scenario in Garcia, Ibrahim and Zhu (2010a), Section 4.1

L1 L2 MPSE TP TN MCC
n =40 MILS 1.04 0.58 1.67 2.98 4.87 0.97
σ = 1 LDlasso 1.57 0.59 1.56 3.00 2.24 0.54
MIRL 1.21 0.65 1.77 2.98 4.83 0.98
CW 1.72 0.77 1.81 3.00 3.09 0.64
RRstep 1.31 0.72 1.75 2.96 4.80 0.95
GarciaAlasso 3.00 4.64 0.91
GarciaSCAD 3.00 4.64 0.91
n = 40 MILS 3.75 6.26 6.67 2.07 4.76 0.73
σ = 3 LDlasso 5.20 6.32 7.31 2.74 2.65 0.50
MIRL 3.82 5.55 6.31 2.24 4.71 0.80
CW 3.77 3.94 4.40 2.93 3.49 0.68
RRstep 4.26 6.60 5.53 2.24 4.65 0.71
GarciaAlasso 2.72 4.31 0.75
GarciaSCAD 2.67 4.53 0.79
n = 60 MILS 0.87 0.38 1.33 2.99 4.76 0.95
σ = 1 LDlasso 1.30 0.39 1.34 3.00 2.48 0.62
MIRL 0.86 0.31 1.29 2.99 4.98 0.99
CW 1.31 0.45 1.40 3.00 3.24 0.65
RRstep 1.00 0.40 1.33 2.99 4.76 0.94
GarciaAlasso 3.00 4.83 0.96
GarciaSCAD 3.00 4.86 0.96