Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 19.
Published in final edited form as: J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Feb 28;25(7):1037–1048. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00373

Table 1.

Characteristics of deaf and hearing participants tested: mean (s.d.) [range] of age, NVIQ (shortened version of Advanced Progressive Matrices - APM), reading level (Gates-McGinitie reading test) and education level. Deaf and hearing participants did not differ on NVIQ or education level (p’s >.1). However, hearing participants were younger and better readers than deaf participants (p’s<.005)*.

NB: see Table 3 for characteristics of participants included in the ERP analyses.

Age* (months) NVIQ (APM) (max=12) Reading raw Score* (max=93) Education level (max=7)
Deaf (n=15) 409 (129) [255-677] 7.1 (3.1) [3-12] 79.9 (11.8) [49-93] 5.9 (1.0) [4-7]
Hearing (n=15) 306 (97) [224-549] 7.6 (3.0) [3-11] 90.4 (1.5) [87-92] 5.6 (0.74) [5-7]