Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 19.
Published in final edited form as: Sociol Sci. 2016 May 6;3:264–295. doi: 10.15195/v3.a13

Table 4.

Difference-in-difference estimates of the effects of ID card program implementation on CST scores, CAHSEE scores, and grades (selected results).

ELA CST (std) Math CST (std) ELA exit exam (std) Math exit exam (std) ELA grades (std) Math grades (std)
ID school 0.34** (0.06) 0.27 (0.22) 0.25** (0.03) 0.42** (0.08) 0.01 (0.22) 0.08 (0.07)
2010 0.03 (0.02) 0.08* (0.02) 0.04* (0.01) 0.02 (0.04) −0.20** (0.06) 0.02 (0.04)
2011 0.01 (0.03) 0.17** (0.04) 0.12** (0.03) 0.02 (0.05) −0.16* (0.07) 0.10 (0.09)
2012 0.07* (0.02) 0.21** (0.02) 0.07** (0.03) 0.10* (0.04) −0.09 (0.07) 0.15* (0.07)
ID*2010 0.00 (0.02) 0.08 (0.07) 0.00 (0.04) −0.16* (0.06) 0.11 (0.06) (0.12) −0.07
ID*2011 0.18** (0.03) 0.31* (0.10) 0.14** (0.03) 0.01 (0.05) 0.21** (0.07) 0.01 (0.10)
ID*2012 0.19** (0.03) 0.33** (0.02) 0.06 (0.03) −0.09 (0.04) 0.21** (0.07) −0.02 (0.11)

N 19,567 18,763 19,504 19,466 19,686 19,722

NOTE: See Appendix Table 1.3 for full model results. ELA and Math grade analyses use tobit estimation to correct for floor effects, and all models use school-clustered standard errors to account for school clustering.

*

p<0.05;

**

p<0.01