Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016 Mar 10;84(6):497–510. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000089

Table 3.

Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) Results for Outcomes During Follow-up

Percentage days abstinent (PDA) (N = 101)
Predictor d 95% CI χ2 p
Treatment condition .010 −.372, .392 0.003 .959
Baseline PDA .127 −.034, .288 2.382 .123
Baseline non-study SUD tx .040 −.122, .201 0.231 .631
Time −.018 −.099, .064 0.179 .673

Treatment x time −.110 −.227, .007 3.382 .066
Inventory of Drug Use Consequences (InDUC) (N = 101)
Predictor d 95% CI χ2 p
Treatment condition −.009 −.439, .260 0.252 .616
Baseline InDUC .245 .078, .411 8.313 .004
Baseline non-study SUD tx −.048 −.220, .124 0.294 .588
Time −.081 −.149, −.013 5.421 .020

Treatment x time .153 .054, .259 9.251 .002
Patient-reported Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS) (N = 98)
Predictor d 95% CI χ2 p
Treatment condition .126 −.199, .452 0.578 .447
Baseline partner-reported DAS .542 .405, .679 60.082 <.001
Baseline non-study SUD tx .095 −.045, .236 1.767 .184
Time .056 −.009, .121 2.896 .089

Treatment x time −.150 −.244, −.057 9.874 .002
Partner-reported Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS) (N = 97)
Predictor d 95% CI χ2 p
Treatment condition −.116 −.467, .235 0.419 .517
Baseline partner-reported DAS .443 .307, .579 40.799 <.001
Baseline non-study SUD tx .107 −.036, .250 2.140 .144
Linear time −.246 −.493, .001 3.813 .051
Quadratic time .042 .004, .080 4.686 .030

Treatment x linear time −.125 −.236, −.013 4.806 .028

Note. Coding for treatment condition: 0 = group behavioral couples therapy, 1 = standard behavioral couples therapy. An autoregressive dependent variable correlation matrix was used for PDA and DAS, and an unstructured dependent variable correlation matrix was used for InDUC.