Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016 Mar 17;84(6):511–525. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000076

Table 4.

Average treatment effects: Parenting and social support

Outcome Scale (>)
(1)
Obs
(2)
Control
1 month ATE
3 month ATE
Mean
(3)
SD
(4)
β
(5)
SE
(6)
Δ
(7)
Δ95%
(8)
β
(9)
SE
(10)
Δ
(11)
Δ95%
(12)
Parenting
Female caregiver report
  Negative parenting 1–5 (−) 823 1.48 0.37   0.07 0.05 0.20 (−0.08 to 0.49) −0.05 0.07 0.14 (−0.52 to 0.25)
  Parental involvement 1–5 (+) 823 3.34 0.68   0.04 0.10 0.06 (−0.24 to 0.36)   0.06 0.13 0.08 (−0.28 to 0.45)
  Positive parenting 1–5 (+) 823 3.66 0.65   0.10 0.09 0.16 (−0.12 to 0.44)   0.08 0.12 0.12 (−0.25 to 0.50)
Male caregiver report
  Negative parenting 1–5 (−) 546 1.61 0.43 −0.07 0.07 0.15 (−0.46 to 0.16) −0.04 0.13 0.10 (−0.70 to 0.51)
  Parental involvement 1–5 (+) 546 3.37 0.68   0.23 0.11* 0.33 (0.01 to 0.66)   0.42 0.16** 0.62 (0.17 to 1.06)
  Positive parenting 1–5 (+) 546 3.62 0.62   0.24 0.13 0.39 (−0.02 to 0.81)   0.19 0.16 0.30 (−0.19 to 0.80)
Youth report
  Negative parenting 1–5 (−) 877 1.75 0.46 −0.04 0.05 0.09 (−0.30 to 0.12) −0.05 0.06 0.10 (−0.35 to 0.15)
  Positive parenting 1–5 (+) 877 3.29 0.60   0.02 0.08 0.03 (−0.22 to 0.29)   0.19 0.11 0.31 (−0.06 to 0.69)
  Parental involvement, female caregiver 1–5 (+) 867 2.79 0.72 −0.05 0.10 0.07 (−0.35 to 0.22)   0.18 0.14 0.26 (−0.13 to 0.64)
  Parental involvement, male caregiver 1–5 (+) 664 2.53 0.80   0.07 0.12 0.09 (−0.22 to 0.39)   0.14 0.16 0.18 (−0.21 to 0.57)

Social Support
Youth report about female caregiver
  Social support, female caregiver 1–5 (+) 871 3.59 0.76   0.06 0.09 0.08 (−0.15 to 0.31)   0.16 0.11 0.22 (−0.07 to 0.50)
  Negative interaction, female caregiver 1–5 (+) 871 4.46 0.52   0.07 0.05 0.14 (−0.06 to 0.34)   0.07 0.07 0.14 (−0.12 to 0.39)
Youth report about male caregiver
  Social support, male caregiver 1–5 (+) 673 2.96 0.92   0.06 0.13 0.07 (−0.20 to 0.34)   0.31 0.15* 0.34 (0.02 to 0.66)
  Negative interaction, male caregiver 1–5 (+) 668 4.55 0.48 −0.02 0.05 0.04 (−0.26 to 0.18) −0.02 0.08 0.04 (−0.36 to 0.28)

p<0.1,

*

p<0.05,

**

p<0.01,

***

p<0.001

Note. This table reports average treatment effects that are based on a comparison of treatment and control periods. Column 1 lists the scale of each outcome. The character in parentheses indicates the valence of higher values: good (+) or bad (−). Column 2 reports the number of observations across churches and time periods. Columns 3 and 4 report unadjusted means and standard deviations for outcomes at j=1 when all churches were in the control period. Columns 5 to 8 report the results from an OLS regression of each outcome on a combined indicator of 1- and 3-month post-treatment observations, time fixed effects (omitted), community fixed effects (omitted), and a vector of baseline covariates (omitted). Standard errors clustered at the household-level to account for siblings being nested in households. Columns 9 to 12 report the linear combination of the 1-month and marginal 3-month treatment effects. Columns 7 and 11 report Glass’s Δ, a standardized effect size (ATE/control group SD), and columns 8 and 12 report the 95% confidence interval around these effect size estimates. MCG and FCG indicate male and female caregivers, respectively. Youth-reported negative interactions with caregivers have been reverse coded so that higher scores represent less negative interactions.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure