Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 14;24(3):207–223. doi: 10.1080/10640266.2015.1090869

Table 4.

The therapists views on experiential knowledge.

Topic/question emergent themes N and (%)
Does experiential knowledge (from having had an eating disorder)have advantages in therapy?  
 Yes = 26 (100%)
 No = 0 (0%)
What kind of advantages?  
 Patient feels recognized and heard = 20 (77%)
 Therapist has enhanced knowledge and insight into eating disorders = 14 (54%)
 Patient feels less shame = 14 (54%)
 Treatment relationship is more powerful = 12 (46%)
 Patient feels increased sense of hope = 11 (42%)
 Patient feels increase sense of trust = 10 (38%)
 Therapists can be seen as a positive role-model = 9 (35%)
 Patient is more open and honest = 7 (27%)
 Patient feels increased motivation = 6 (23%)
 Treatment relationship is based on equality = 5 (19%)
 Therapist has high empathy = 4 (15%)
Does having experiential knowledge (from having had an eating disorder) have disadvantages in therapy?  
 Yes = 17 (65%)
 No = 9 (35%)
Does using experiential knowledge (from having had an eating disorder) have disadvantages in therapy?  
 Yes = 11 (42%)
 No = 15 (58%)
What kind of disadvantages?  
 Projection/identification N = 21 (81%)
 Too much involvement/commitment in therapy from therapist N = 13 (50%)
 Why use experiential knowledge during therapeutic sessions?  
 Providing insight into the recovery process N = 21 (81%)
 Establishing a working relationship N = 13 (50%)
 Activating/motivating the patient N = 7 (27%)
How far do you go when sharing your own experiences, what do and don’t you share?  
 What to share is dependent on the patient, the story of the patient and the situation during the session = 14 (54%)
 I don’t tell details about the symptoms = 12 (46%)
 I don’t mention any weights (past lowest weight or current weight) = 8 (31%)
 I don’t tell intimate personal details = 5 (19%)
What’s important when applying your experiential knowledge in a careful manner?  
 Self-insight/self-care = 16 (62%)
 Training, guidance and support = 14 (54%)
 Purposefully/functional = 8 (31%)
 Safe work environment = 7 (27%)
 Being recovered long and well enough = 4 (15%)
What kind of positive reactions?  
 Reactions regarding recognition and understanding (tension relief, heavy nodding, crying) = 26 (100%)
 Reactions regarding openness (making more eye contact, sharing more) = 8 (31%)
 Reactions regarding hope (patients tell they feel more hope) = 5 (19%)

Note: Percentages are rounded to the nearest percent.