Table 3.

Odds ratio for associations between perceived norms and methamphetamine use (logistic regression).

	Meth use		Meth use

	(Bivariate)		(Multivariate)

	Unadj. OR	95% CI	Adj. OR	95% CI
Demographic characteristics
Field site (Santa Monica)	2.32^**	(1.46–3.71)	0.54	(0.28–1.06)
Age	1.06	(0.95–1.18)	–	–
Time spent homeless	1.06	(0.98–1.16)	–	–
Gender (male)	1.63	(0.95–2.81)	–	–
Sexual orientation (nonheterosexual)	1.72^*	(1.02–2.92)	2.02^*	(1.04–3.90)
Race (White)	1.61^*	(1.01–2.58)	0.65	(0.33–1.28)
Current living situation (streets)	2.83^***	(1.75–4.56)	1.05	(0.72–2.75)
High school graduate (yes)	0.71	(0.44–1.15)	–	–
Traveler (yes)	2.81^***	(1.74–4.54)	1.50	(0.79–2.84)
Sex under influence of drugs (yes)	3.78^***	(2.34–6.09)	1.33^**	(1.12–1.58)
Perceived norms
Descriptive	6.42^***	(3.87–10.65)	3.55^***	(1.93–6.52)
Injunctive	0.13^***	(0.08–0.22)	0.11^***	(0.05–0.23)
Pseudo R²			0.29
2 log likelihood			269.99

Note. Only variables significant in bivariate analyses at p < .05 were included in the final adjusted analyses. Unadj. = unadjusted; Adj. = adjusted.

^***

p < .001.

^**

p < .01.

p < .05.