Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 20.
Published in final edited form as: Bone. 2012 Sep 3;51(6):975–980. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.08.130

Table 3.

Percentages of women receiving AOM by fracture risk factors

GLOW USA cohort (n=27,957) Low risk (n=3013) High risk (n=3699)

% p-valuea % p-valuea % p-valuea
Total 22.4 13.4 35.7
Education 0.94 0.96 0.007
 High school or less 22.4 13.4 32.8
 More than high school 22.5 13.5 37.3
Race <0.0001 0.97 <0.0001
 White 23.5 13.5 36.6
 Non-white 16.2 13.4 24.8
Number of comorbidities 0.57 0.01 0.26
 0 22.9 15.7 38.2
 ≥1 22.5 12.1 35.4
General health 0.01 0.2 0.03
 Excellent/very good/good 22.7 13.6 36.7
 Fair/poor 21.0 10.5 32.1
Prescription drug coverage <0.0001 <0.0001 0.004
 No 13.4 2.5 27.5
 Yes 23.2 14.0 36.5
Concern about osteoporosis <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
 Very/somewhat 25.2 15.2 39.0
 Not at all 6.3 2.0 11.9
Perceived fracture risk <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
 Same/lower than others 17.3 9.6 27.5
 Higher than others 43.5 40.5 53.6
Vitality score <0.0001 <0.001 0.001
 ≤median (62.5) 21.2 10.9 33.5
 >median (62.5) 24.0 15.6 39.0
Physical function score 0.12 0.001 0.03
 ≤median (85) 22.0 10.0 34.4
 >median (85) 22.8 14.7 37.9

AOM, anti-osteoporosis medication; GLOW, Global Longitudinal study of Osteoporosis in Women.

a

p values are from chi-square tests of differences in percentage treated between rows within risk groups.