Table 3.

Family practitioner visit in the past 3 months by sexual orientation among women (N=1 138 653): practice characteristics interactions

	Proportion of practitioners aged under 50 years			Proportion practice practitioners female			Proportion practice practitioners UK qualified
Sexual orientation (base heterosexual)
Lesbian	1.019	(0.810 to 1.283)	p=0.870	1.081	(0.838 to 1.395)	p=0.547	0.934	(0.765 to 1.142)	p=0.507
Bisexual	1.002	(0.762 to 1.317)	p=0.991	1.328	(0.964 to 1.830)	p=0.082	1.223	(0.966 to 1.550)	p=0.094
Other	0.749	(0.577 to 0.972)	p=0.030	0.927	(0.680 to 1.264)	p=0.634	0.750	(0.599 to 0.941)	p=0.013
Prefer not to say	0.922	(0.843 to 1.008)	p=0.075	0.970	(0.873 to 1.077)	p=0.565	0.890	(0.823 to 0.962)	p=0.004
Not answered	0.892	(0.804 to 0.989)	p=0.029	1.045	(0.928 to 1.176)	p=0.467	0.914	(0.838 to 0.998)	p=0.044

Logistic regression of family practitioner use in the past 3 months.

SEs are robust to heteroskedasticity and clustered at the practice level.

Estimates are OR relative to heterosexual interacted with respective practice characteristic.

95% CIs in brackets.