Table 3.
First Author (Ref. #) |
Year |
Sensitivity |
Specificity |
Positive Predictive Value |
||||||
History |
PE |
ECG |
History |
PE |
ECG |
History |
PE |
ECG |
||
Fuller et al. (70) | 1997 | 0 | 17 | 83 | 98 | 97 | 98 | 0 | 0.6 | 3.4 |
Wilson et al. (71) | 2008 | 0 | 100 | 98 | 99 | 0 | 22.5 | |||
Bessem et al. (72) | 2009 | 25 | 0 | 75 | 95 | 97 | 93 | 4 | 0 | 9.0 |
Hevia et al. (73) | 2009 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 99 | 100 | 94 | 0 | 0 | 2.7 |
Baggish et al. (47) | 2010 | 0 | 33 | 66 | 96 | 98 | 84 | 0 | 0 | 2.4 |
Magalski et al. (74) | 2011 | 44 | 11 | 100 | 75 | 95 | 91 | 0 | 1 | 9.5 |
Fudge et al. (35) | 2014 | 40 | 0 | 100 | 69 | 90 | 95 | 0.5 | 8 | 6.9 |
Price et al. (75) | 2014 | 20 | 40 | 100 | 88 | 96 | 97 | 0.4 | 3 | 8.1 |
Menafoglio et al. (76) | 2014 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 99 | 99 | 96 | 0 | 0 | 9.5 |
Values are %. Adapted with permission from Harmon et al. (37). ECG = electrocardiogram; PE = physical examination.