Table 3.
Adaptations to increase resiliency of water supplies to disruptions by fire. Implementation level: (1) relatively low cost given availability of staff and data; (2) moderate cost and difficulty; and (3) high cost, very difficult owing to legislative, political, monetary and practical constraints.
time frame | adaptation | implementation level |
---|---|---|
preparation | establish contingency plans | 1 |
identify alternate water sources | 1 | |
identify critical source-water areas | 1 | |
build collaborations | 1 | |
identify vulnerabilities and system deficiencies | 2 | |
pre-fire fuel thinning | 2 | |
pre-fire modelling to determine areas at greatest risk of flooding, erosion and deposition | 2 | |
develop real time monitoring networks | 3 | |
plan and get permits to construct pre-sedimentation basins | 3 | |
response | close water intakes | 1 |
implement post-fire rehabilitation measures to stabilize hillslopes, channels and infrastructure | 2 | |
install high-frequency chemical and turbidity sensors (ideally with telemetry capability) | 2 | |
post-fire modelling to identify potential flooding, erosion and deposition | 3 | |
construct pre-sedimentation basins | 3 | |
recovery | strengthen existing infrastructure | 2 |
build new infrastructure | 3 |