Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2016 May-Jun;40(3):428–435. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000372

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Bland-Altman plots showing comparisons of ADC measures (×10−3 mm2/s) among 3 readers for lesions using the manual (A) and semi-automated (B) techniques as well as for normal tissue using the manual (C) and semi-automated (D) techniques. In all panels the middle horizontal line (the average difference of readers’ paired ADC measures) is close to zero. The limits of agreement for lesions were narrower for the semi-automated method (B) when compared to the manual method (A), indicating the semi-automated method had greater inter-reader reproducibility.