Skip to main content
. 2016 May 20;10(5):e0004743. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004743

Fig 3. Cost-effective expenditure to avert a Zika infection.

Fig 3

The maximum investment that would be cost-effective for a country to avert a Zika infection increases with the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita and with the birth rate. Some countries and regions at risk for Zika are indicated for illustration. A color scale indicates the cost-effectiveness threshold (from yellow: lowest cost; to purple: highest cost).