Skip to main content
. 2016 May 12;4(5):E508–E514. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-106206

Table 1. Performance characteristics in the OVERALL evaluation of the study images.

Randomized VC setting Evaluator Accuracy for the first reading Accuracy for the second reading Difference in accuracy (%) [95 % CI]
WLI 1 61.7 [56.5, 66.7] 54.3 [49.0, 59.4] – 7.4 [– 12.5, – 2.3]1
2 49.1 [43.9, 54.4] 44.6 [39.5, 49.8] – 4.6 [– 8.8, – 0.3]1
3 49.1 [43.9, 54.4] 52.6 [47.3, 57.7]  3.4 [0.0, 6.8]1
Globally2 53.3 50.5 – 2.9 [– 9.2, 3.5]
FICE 1 4 63.4 [58.3, 68.3] 52.3 [47.1, 57.5] – 11.1 [– 16.2, – 6.0]1
5 61.4 [56.2, 66.4] 63.4 [58.3, 68.3]  2.0 [– 3.3, 7.3]
6 44.7 [39.6, 49.9] 75.4 [70.6, 79.6] 30.7 [24.3, 36.7]1
Globally2 56.5 63.7  7.1 [– 17.0, 31.3]
FICE 2 7 63.1 [58.0, 68.0] 73.4 [68.6, 77.8] 10.3 [5.3, 15.2]1
8 65.4 [60.3, 70.2] 58.9 [53.6, 63.9] – 6.6 [– 12.0, – 1.1]1
9 75.7 [71.0, 79.9] 79.4 [74.9, 83.3]  3.7 [– 0.5, 7.9]
Globally2 68.1 70.6  2.5 [– 7.1, 12.1]
FICE 3 10 62.0 [56.8, 66.9 77.7 [73.1, 81.8] 15.7 [10.1, 21.2]1
11 58.9 [53.6, 63.9] 50.6 [45.4, 55.8] – 8.3 [– 14.2, – 2.2]1
12 52.6 [47.3, 57.7] 59.7 [54.5, 64.7]  7.1 [1.3, 12.9]1
Globally2 57.8 62.7  4.9 [– 8.9, 18.6]
Blue Mode 13 36.9 [32.0, 42.0] 62.3 [57.1, 67.2] 25.4 [19.1, 31.4]1
14 71.7 [66.8, 76.2] 77.1 [72.5, 81.2]  5.4 [1.0, 9.8]1
15 68.0 [62.9, 72.7] 76.3 [71.6, 80.4]  8.3 [3.3, 13.3]1
Globally2 58.9 71.9 13.0 [0.8, 25.3]1

VC, virtual chromoendoscopy; WLI, white light image; CI, confidence interval

1

statistically significant

2

stratified McNemar test