Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Res. 2016 Apr 19;148:310–317. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.04.008

Table 3.

Results from multiple-lag models examining association of inflammatory markers [change (95%CI)] with an interquartile range increase of air pollutants in the U.S. trucking industry a

Inflam. Exposure ECb occ PM2.5d



Marker Period Change (95%CI) Change (95%CI) Change (95% CI)
CRP Lag0-12 -0.40 (-1.44, 0.64) 1.18 (-2.43, 4.79) 1.12 (-1.31, 3.54)
(mg/L) Lag12-24 -1.04 (-3.59, 1.50) -1.77 (-4.72, 1.19) -0.84 (-3.05, 1.36)
Lag24-36 -0.34 (-1.13, 0.45) -2.37 (-6.72, 1.99) -1.19 (-3.85, 1.46)
Lag36-48 0.08 (-0.85, 1.00) 0.06 (-1.86, 1.97) 0.28 (-0.99, 1.55)
Net effect -1.71 (-5.07, 1.66) -2.90 (-7.36, 1.57) -0.64 (-3.19, 1.90)
IL-6 Lag0-12 0.06 (-0.48, 0.61) 0.47 (-1.19, 2.14) 0.30 (-0.79, 1.39)
(pg/mL) Lag12-24 -0.15 (-1.52, 1.22) 1.19 (-1.16, 3.53) 0.66 (-0.98, 2.31)
Lag24-36 0.00 (-0.36, 0.37) -0.22 (-2.09, 1.65) 0.48 (-0.82, 1.78)
Lag36-48 -0.22 (-0.95, 0.51) -1.69 (-4.29, 0.91) -0.61 (-1.74, 0.53)
Net effect -0.30 (-1.88, 1.28) -0.25 (-2.76, 2.26) 0.84 (-0.88, 2.56)
slCAM-1 Lag0-12 0.94 (-9.88, 11.8) 0.52 (-27.2, 28.3) -10.8 (-28.9, 7.15)
(ng/mL) Lag12-24 24.9 (2.95, 46.8) 54.9 (12.3, 97.5) 24.5 (-6.15, 55.1)
Lag24-36 12.1 (2.10, 22.1) 46.5 (21.2, 71.8) 29.2 (4.36, 54.1)
Lag36-48 -13.2 (-28.3, 1.91) -16.9 (-64.5, 30.8) -15.5 (-39.4, 8.48)
Net effect 24.7 (-2.37, 51.8) 85.0 (28.8, 141.3) 27.4 (-20.4, 75.2)
a

Linear regression model using robust variance; adjusted for age (quartile), race, sex, obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m2), exercise (>2hrs/wk), smoking status, secondhand smoke exposure in the past 24 hrs, and cholesterol drug use.

b

Corresponds to an IQR increase of Lag0-12 EC: 0.16 μg/m3

c

Corresponds to an IQR increase of Lag0-12 OC: 3.47 μg/m3

d

Corresponds to an IQR increase of Lag0-2 PM2.5: 6.85 μg/m3

e

Net effect represents the summed up effect estimates of Lag0-12, Lag12-24, Lag24-36, and Lag36-48. Standard error of the net effect was calculated by square-root of the sum of variance and covariance of the four effect estimates.