Table 6.
Survey Modality | Performance Metrics | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Word Countsa (Elicitation/Interview) | Completenessb | Balancec | Meaningfulness | |||
Communication | Coordination | (Positive vs. Negative) | Expressivityd (Expectation) | Narrative Texturee | ||
Round 1 Full | 0.10 | 0.40 | 0.30 | 0.99 | 0.14 | 0.56 |
Phone | 0.16f | 0.59f | 0.37 | 0.99 | 0.20f | 0.71f |
Web | 0.02 | 0.26 | 0.22 | 1.00 | 0.04 | 0.37 |
Round 2 Full | 0.15 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 1.06 | 0.44 | 0.64 |
Phone | 0.22f | 0.71 | 0.75 | 1.09 | 0.57f | 0.81f |
Web | 0.09 | 0.83 | 0.75 | 1.04 | 0.31 | 0.48 |
Ratio of total word count in EPN to total word count from interview.
Congruence of reporting of this domain on both EPN and interview.
Ratio of positive to negative on EPN divided by the ratio of positive to negative valence on the interview.
Ratio of expectation count on EPN to expectation count on interview.
Ratio of narrative texture synthetic code from the EPN to narrative texture synthetic code from the interview.
Difference between phone and web protocol statistically significant, p < .05.
Source: Calculated from authors' own data.