Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 12;116:1139–1148. doi: 10.1007/s00421-016-3370-6

Table 1.

Fasting and time-averaged total area under the postprandial concentration vs. time curve in the control and exercise conditions on day 2

Control Exercise Control vs. exercise 95 % CIa Effect size
Time lag
 Fasting (min) 4.29 (3.75–4.91) 4.33 (3.78–4.96) −11 to 14 0.04
 TAUC (min) 4.12 (3.68–4.63) 4.18 (3.72–4.68) −8 to 12 0.06
Peak thrombin concentration
 Fasting (nM) 73.5 (55.4–97.3) 74.4 (56.1–98.6) −26 to 39 0.03
 TAUC (nM) 89.5 (76.4–104.9) 80.3 (68.5–94.1) −25 to 7 0.36
Endogenous thrombin potential
 Fasting (nM min−1) 1558 (1360–1785) 1475 (1288–1690) −19 to 11 0.23
 TAUC (nM min−1) 1708 (1571–1857) 1628 (1497–1770) −12 to 3 0.32
Triacylglycerol
 Fasting (mmol L−1) 0.96 (0.81–1.13) 0.83 (0.71–0.99) −21 to −4b 0.46
 TAUC (mmol L−1) 1.28 (1.05–1.55) 1.13 (0.93–1.37) −20 to −2b 0.34
Glucose
 Fasting (mmol L−1) 5.53 (5.34–5.72) 5.53 (5.35–5.73) −3 to 3 0.02
 TAUC (mmol L−1) 5.69 (5.41–5.98) 5.81 (5.53–6.10) −3 to 7 0.19
Insulin
 Fasting (pmol L−1) 28.9 (23.2–36.1) 28.3 (22.6–35.3) −16 to 14 0.05
 TAUC (pmol L−1) 156 (131–185) 151 (127–180) −18 to 14 0.11

Values are geometric mean (95 % confidence interval) for n = 16. Statistical analyses are based on natural log transformed data. Comparisons were made using linear mixed models

TAUC time-averaged total area under the concentration vs. time curve

a95 % confidence interval for the ratio of geometric means

bSignificant difference between exercise and control conditions (P < 0.05)