Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 27;157:281–294. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3809-9

Table 5.

Per node figures from the studies used in the meta-analysis. nd: not defined, na: not applicable

Study (Ref.) Total nodes Successful standard technique Successful SPIO technique Both techniques successful Both techniques failed Malignant nodes Malignant nodes detected by standard technique Malignant nodes detected by SPIO Malignant nodes detected by both techniques Malignant nodes in which both techniques failed
Douek et al. [10] 404 297 323 268 52 nd nd nd nd nd
Thill et al. [11] 291 267 283 263 nd 45 41 43 41 4
Rubio et al. [12] 287 230 264 nd nd nd nd nd nd nd
Pineiro et al. [13] 321 277 292 260 12 76 67 69 65 5
Ghilli et al. [14] 380 360 364 344 nd 77 72 73 68 5
Hopeau et al. [15] 214 193 208 188 1 61 54 60 53 1
Nordic study 403 368 376 353 12 68 63 62 60 2