Table 3.

Group cohesion by condition.

Cohesion variable and condition vs comparison condition			n	Mean (SD)a	P
Attraction to group-task
	Standard		34	5.71 (1.37)
		Group dynamics-based–low presence			.08
		Group dynamics-based–high presence			.39
	Group dynamics-based–low presence		34	6.40 (1.08)
		Standard			.08
		Group dynamics-based–high presence			.68
	Group dynamics-based–high presence		32	6.13 (1.21)
		Standard			.39
		Group dynamics-based–low presence			.68
Attraction to group-social
	Standard		34	4.88 (1.19)
		Group dynamics-based–low presence			.001
		Group dynamics-based–high presence			.17
	Group dynamics-based–low presence		34	6.06 (1.28)
		Standard			.001
		Group dynamics-based–high presence			.19
	Group dynamics-based–high presence		32	5.48 (1.33)
		Standard			.17
		Group dynamics-based–low presence			.19
Group integration-task
	Standard		34	4.12 (1.18)
		Group dynamics-based–low presence			<.001
		Group dynamics-based–high presence			.02
	Group dynamics-based–low presence		34	5.20 (1.04)
		Standard			<.001
		Group dynamics-based–high presence			.43
	Group dynamics-based–high presence		32	4.86 (0.93)
		Standard			.02
		Group dynamics-based–low presence			.43
Group integration-social
	Standard		34	4.61 (1.64)
		Group dynamics-based–low presence			.04
		Group dynamics-based–high presence			.48
	Group dynamics-based–low presence		34	5.46 (1.22)
		Standard			.04
		Group dynamics-based–high presence			.44
	Group dynamics-based–high presence		32	5.02 (1.17)
		Standard			.48
		Group dynamics-based–low presence			.44

^aPerceived cohesion scales ranged from 1 to 9.