Skip to main content
. 2016 May 20;17:254. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1379-0

Table 1.

Variability in patient recruitment process indicators among comparison groups and collaborating centers

PHC center Months recruiting Attendees FINDRISC Screening reach At risk of T2D OGTT performed Refusal rate Non- diabetic Included in study
n Total n Total n (%) n n (%) n
Intervention centers
 SV 24.5 4097 256 6.2 % 158 (61.7 %) 114 27.8 % 100 (87.7 %) 77
 GK 25.7 7440 282 3.8 % 212 (75.2 %) 116 44.3 % 98 (84.5 %) 82
 BL 20.8 2068 296 14.3 % 116 (39.2 %) 52 55.2 % 47 (90.4 %) 39
 LG 18.6 1951 391 20.0 % 125 (32.0 %) 57 54.4 % 52 (91.2 %) 51
 DB 28.2 6229 125 2.0 % 100 (80.0 %) 59 41.0 % 56 (94.9 %) 54
 IZ 26.1 5106 456 8.9 % 260 (57.0 %) 162 37.7 % 143 (88.3 %) 123
 AR 17.6 3081 371 12.0 % 81 (21.8 %) 33 59.2 % 32 (96.7 %) 28
Total 29,972 2177 7.3 % 1052 (48.4 %) 593 43.3 % 528 (88.4 %) 454
Control centers
 ZU 28.6 4632 310 6.7 % 219 (70.6 %) 176 19.6 % 146 (83.0 %) 146
 LL 25.4 5041 256 5.1 % 150 (58.6 %) 106 28.7 % 93 (87.7 %) 93
 TX 19.4 3928 509 13.0 % 165 (32.4 %) 82 43.0 % 78 (95.1 %) 78
 AZ 25.8 3370 325 9.6 % 205 (63.1 %) 163 19.0 % 143 (87.7 %) 143
 IR 14.9 6227 128 2.1 % 79 (61.7 %) 41 45.6 % 35 (85.4 %) 35
 AB 22.7 5589 183 3.3 % 138 (75.4 %) 100 26.8 % 90 (90.0 %) 90
 SM 26.3 8534 282 3.3 % 120 (42.6 %) 53 54.2 % 49 (92.4 %) 49
Total 37,321 1993 5.3 % 1076 (54.0 %) 721 33.0 % 634 (88.3 %) 634

T2D type-2 diabetes, FINDRISC Finnish Diabetes Risk Score, OGTT oral glucose tolerance test, PHC primary health care