Skip to main content
. 2016 May 20;17:254. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1379-0

Table 4.

Variability in intervention-related process indicators among collaborating centers allocated to the intervention group

PHC center Intervention reacha Educational sessions completed Intervention format (% group, individual, mixed) Reception of ≥5 remote support contacts
SV 54,7 % 96.1 % 98.7 %, 1.3 %, 0 % 94.8 %
GK 44,7 % 80.9 % 100 %, 0 %, 0 % 79.8 %
BL 36,8 % 82.5 % 89.7 %, 7.7 %, 2.6 % 77.5 %
LG 44,4 % 92.2 % 62.7 %, 37.3 %, 0 % 92.2 %
DB 56,8 % 64.8 % 90.7 %, 5.6 %, 3.7 % 81.5 %
IZ 52,8 % 66.7 % 100 %, 0 %, 0 % 86.2 %
AR 35,6 % 75.9 % 75 %, 1 %, 17.9 % 86.2 %
Total 47,9 % 78.8 % 92.1 %, 6.2 %, 1 .8 % 85.8 %

aCalculated as the proportion of patients included in the intervention from those detected as being at high risk of T2D after removing the proportion of diagnosed unknown T2D patients in each of the centers