Table 4.
PHC center | Intervention reacha | Educational sessions completed | Intervention format (% group, individual, mixed) | Reception of ≥5 remote support contacts |
---|---|---|---|---|
SV | 54,7 % | 96.1 % | 98.7 %, 1.3 %, 0 % | 94.8 % |
GK | 44,7 % | 80.9 % | 100 %, 0 %, 0 % | 79.8 % |
BL | 36,8 % | 82.5 % | 89.7 %, 7.7 %, 2.6 % | 77.5 % |
LG | 44,4 % | 92.2 % | 62.7 %, 37.3 %, 0 % | 92.2 % |
DB | 56,8 % | 64.8 % | 90.7 %, 5.6 %, 3.7 % | 81.5 % |
IZ | 52,8 % | 66.7 % | 100 %, 0 %, 0 % | 86.2 % |
AR | 35,6 % | 75.9 % | 75 %, 1 %, 17.9 % | 86.2 % |
Total | 47,9 % | 78.8 % | 92.1 %, 6.2 %, 1 .8 % | 85.8 % |
aCalculated as the proportion of patients included in the intervention from those detected as being at high risk of T2D after removing the proportion of diagnosed unknown T2D patients in each of the centers