Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Nutr. 2016 Jan 27;55(4):1707–1716. doi: 10.1007/s00394-015-0989-8

Table 2.

Multivariable-adjusted HRs (95 % CIs) of incident metabolic syndrome by intakes of LCω3PUFA, EPA, DHA and non-fried fish, the CARDIA study, 1985–2010 (n = 4356)

Quintiles of LCω3PUFA intake P for linear trenda

Q1 (lowest) Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 (highest)

Total LCω3PUFA
Median (IQR, g/day) 0.03 (0.02–0.04) 0.07 (0.06–0.08) 0.11 (0.10–0.13) 0.18 (0.16–0.20) 0.33 (0.27–0.44)
No. of events/participants 258/868 230/870 224/871 204/877 153/870
  Model 1b 1 (referent) 0.77 (0.64,0.92) 0.68 (0.56,0.81) 0.59 (0.49,0.71) 0.42 (0.35,0.52) <0.01
  Model 2c 1 (referent) 0.89 (0.75,1.07) 0.76 (0.64,0.92) 0.71 (0.59,0.87) 0.54 (0.44,0.67) <0.01
  Model 3ad 1 (referent) 0.91 (0.76,1.09) 0.76 (0.63,0.92) 0.71 (0.58,0.87) 0.52 (0.41,0.65) <0.01
  Model 3be 1 (referent) 0.90 (0.75,1.07) 0.75 (0.62,0.90) 0.69 (0.56,0.84) 0.50 (0.40,0.63) <0.01
  Model 4f 1 (referent) 0.91 (0.76,1.09) 0.76 (0.63,0.91) 0.71 (0.59,0.86) 0.55 (0.44,0.68) <0.01
EPA
Median (IQR, g/day) 0.01 (0.00–0.01) 0.02 (0.02–0.03) 0.04 (0.04–0.05) 0.07 (0.06,0.08) 0.14 (0.11,0.19)
No. of events/participants 255/873 214/869 217/889 211/848 172/877
Model 1b 1 (referent) 0.77 (0.64,0.92) 0.70 (0.58,0.84) 0.71 (0.59,0.85) 0.55 (0.45,0.67) <0.01
  Model 2c 1 (referent) 0.84 (0.70,1.004) 0.79 (0.66,0.95) 0.81 (0.67,0.98) 0.69 (0.56,0.85) <0.01
  Model 3ad 1 (referent) 0.86 (0.71,1.03) 0.82 (0.68,0.99) 0.83 (0.69,1.01) 0.69 (0.56,0.86) <0.01
  Model 3be 1 (referent) 0.85 (0.71,1.03) 0.82 (0.67,0.99) 0.82 (0.68,1.004) 0.69 (0.55,0.85) <0.01
  Model 4f 1 (referent) 0.86 (0.71,1.03) 0.76 (0.64,0.92) 0.79 (0.65,0.95) 0.69 (0.56,0.85) <0.01
DHA
Median (IQR, g/day) 0.01 (0.00–0.01) 0.03 (0.02–0.03) 0.05 (0.04–0.06) 0.08 (0.07–0.10) 0.16 (0.13–0.21)
No. of events/participants 289/832 242/909 209/882 182/852 147/881
  Model 1b 1 (referent) 0.55 (0.46,0.65) 0.44 (0.37,0.53) 0.37 (0.30,0.44) 0.28 (0.23,0.34) <0.01
  Model 2c 1 (referent) 0.63 (0.53,0.75) 0.52 (0.43,0.62) 0.44 (0.36,0.53) 0.36 (0.29,0.44) <0.01
  Model 3ad 1 (referent) 0.65 (0.55,0.78) 0.51 (0.42,0.62) 0.43 (0.35,0.52) 0.34 (0.27,0.42) <0.01
  Model 3be 1 (referent) 0.64 (0.54,0.77) 0.50 (0.42,0.61) 0.42 (0.34,0.51) 0.33 (0.26,0.41) <0.01
  Model 4f 1 (referent) 0.65 (0.55,0.77) 0.53 (0.44,0.64) 0.43 (0.36,0.53) 0.37 (0.30,0.46) <0.01

Non-fried fish consumption P for linear
trenda

<1 month 1–3 month 1 week 2–4 week ≥5 week

Median (IQR, serving/day) 0.00 (0.00–0.01) 0.09 (0.06–0.12) 0.21 (0.18–0.25) 0.48 (0.38–0.59) 1.32 (0.96–1.93)
No. of events/participants 87/250 81/317 111/458 293/1257 497/2074
  Model 1b 1 (referent) 0.64 (0.47,0.86) 0.55 (0.42,0.73) 0.51 (0.40,0.65) 0.51 (0.40,0.64) <0.01
  Model 2c 1 (referent) 0.70 (0.51,0.95) 0.68 (0.52,0.91) 0.67 (0.53,0.86) 0.71 (0.56,0.89) 0.49
  Model 3ad 1 (referent) 0.69 (0.51,0.94) 0.68 (0.51,0.90) 0.69 (0.54,0.88) 0.73 (0.58,0.93) 0.80
  Model 3be 1 (referent) 0.71 (0.53,0.97) 0.70 (0.53,0.93) 0.70 (0.55,0.90) 0.75 (0.59,0.96) 0.84
  Model 4f 1 (referent) 0.68 (0.50,0.93) 0.70 (0.53,0.93) 0.65 (0.51,0.83) 0.69 (0.55,0.88) 0.44

All models were constructed using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis

CARDIA Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults, CI confidence interval, DHA docosahexaenoic acid, EPA eicosapentaenoic acid, HR hazard ratio, IQR inter-quartile range, LCω3PUFA long-chain ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid

a

P for trend was examined by using medians in each quintile/subgroup of exposure of interest

b

Model 1: adjustment for age (years, continuous), gender, ethnicity (African American, Caucasian) and study center

c

Model 2: model 1 with additional adjustment for education (years, continuous), smoking status (never, former, current), family history of diabetes (yes or no), physical activity (quintiles), alcohol consumption (0, 0.1–9.9, 10–19.9, ≥20 g/day), and baseline body mass index (<25, 25–29.9, ≥30 kg/m2). Fried fish consumption (yes vs. no) was also adjusted when non-fried fish was the exposure

d

Model 3a (sensitivity analysis): model 2 with additional adjustment for intakes (quintiles) of protein, saturated fatty acid, polyunsaturated fatty acid, and total energy

e

Model 3b (sensitivity analysis): model 2 with additional adjustment for “Fruit-Vegetable” pattern (quintiles), meat pattern (quintile) and total energy intake (quintile)

f

Model 4 (sensitivity analysis): model 2 with additional adjustment for each component of metabolic syndrome at baseline, except baseline body mass index, because it is highly correlated with waist circumference