Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Matrix Biol. 2015 Nov 24;52-54:219–233. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2015.11.007

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Enamel Thickness. The distance from the DEJ to the enamel surface was measured in mandibular incisor cross-sections at the level of the alveolar crest. Each measurement was made at the thickest part of the enamel layer at the centro-mesial side of the incisor cross-section. ImageJ was calibrated using the magnification bar provided by the CAMECA (Cameka Instruments, Inc. Madison, WI, USA). The thickness values for each genotype were averaged and standard deviations were calculated using SPSS. The average measurements and standard deviations are listed on the left and plotted on the right. No significant differences in enamel thickness were found (t-test, p>0.05) between any of the genotypes (n = 5 per genotype).