Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 23;78(2):136–143. doi: 10.1007/s12262-015-1439-9

Table 3.

Evaluating performance of risk predictor models

Parameter Number of studies (%)
Validation
 Apparent 4 (57 %)
 Internal
  Bootstrapping 0
  Jack-knifing 0
  Random split sample 3 (43 %)
  Cross validation 0
 Temporal 0
 External 0
Performance metrics
 Discrimination
  C-statistic 6 (86 %)
 Spearman’s rank correlation 1 (14 %)
Calibration 2 (29 %)
 Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic 2 (29 %)
 Calibration plot 0
Classification
 Reclassification (NRI) 0
 Other (for example, sensitivity and specificity) 6 (86 %)

NRI net reclassification index