Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 30;16(2):217–227. doi: 10.1007/s40268-016-0131-2

Table 2.

Summary of lung function endpoints

UMEC/VI, PP population,
N = 463
TIO + IND, PP population,
N = 455
Trough FEV1 [mL; PP population]
 Day 85 n = 392 n = 392
  LS mean change from baseline (SE) 172 (11) 171 (11)
  Difference (95 % CI) 1 (−29 to 30)
0- to 6-h WM FEV1 [L; ITT population]
 Day 1 n = 478 n = 471
  LS mean change from baseline (SE) 184 (7) 185 (7)
  Difference (95 % CI) −1 (−20 to 18)
 Day 84 n = 455 n = 452
  LS mean change from baseline (SE) 235 (11) 258 (11)
  Difference (95 % CI) −23 (−54 to 8)
Trough FVC [mL; ITT population]
 Day 85 n = 455 n = 455
  LS mean change from baseline (SE) 239 (18) 220 (18)
  Difference (95 % CI) 20 (−29 to 68)

CI confidence interval, FEV 1 forced expiratory volume in 1 s, FVC forced vital capacity, IND indacaterol, ITT intent-to-treat, LS least squares, PP per-protocol, SE standard error, TIO tiotropium, UMEC umeclidinium, VI vilanterol, WM weighted mean