Table 1.
Vegetable | Relative GFP intensity | |
---|---|---|
Nabana | Brassica napus L. | 1.49∗∗ ± 0.07 |
Spinach | Spinacia oleracea L. | 1.33∗ ± 0.12 |
Lettuce | Lactuca sativa | 1.79∗∗ ± 0.10 |
Red paprika | Capsicum annuum L. | 1.92∗∗ ± 0.13 |
Cabbage | Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata | 2.18∗∗ ± 0.31 |
Tomato | Solanum lycopersicum L. | 0.74∗ ± 0.07 |
Komatsuna | Brassica rapa L. var. perviridis cv. Komatsuna | 1.11ns ± 0.22 |
Onion | Allium cepa L. | 1.16ns ± 0.23 |
Broccoli | Brassica oleracea L. | 1.60∗∗ ± 0.11 |
Japanese radish | Raphanus sativus L. | 1.44∗∗ ± 0.32 |
Edible flower | Brassica rapa L. var. nippo-oleifera | 1.83∗∗ ± 0.25 |
Mulberry | Morus alba L. | 2.25∗∗ ± 0.19 |
The transgenic flies were fed with a vegetable diet, and green fluorescent protein (GFP) signals in the salivary gland nuclei of the third-instar larvae were detected. The GFP intensity was analyzed using the MetaMorph software and was subtracted by that of the background signal; then the GFP intensity of the vegetable group relative to that of the control group was calculated. n = 6 for each sample. ∗ p < 0.05. ∗∗ p < 0.01. nsNot significant.