Skip to main content
. 2016 May 9;2016:8263832. doi: 10.1155/2016/8263832

Table 1.

Characteristics of the included studies.

Author Publication year Study location Studying time Age Style N1 N2 Cycloplegia Adjustments OR, 95% CI Definitions
Iyer et al. [7] 2012 Singapore NA 40.5 (6–72) m Refractive error: myopia 137 2502 Yes Adjusted for age, gender, total family income, father's and mother's education, height, parental myopia, reading words or picture books, and total time spent outdoors 0.39 (0.20–0.76) The definition of myopia was SER of at least −0.5 D

Borchert et al. [10] 2011 USA NA 6 to 72 m Refractive error: myopia 378 9515 Yes No 1.08 (0.74–1.56) Myopia was defined as SER error ≤−1.00 D
NA 6 to 72 m Refractive error: hyperopia 1788 6781 Yes No 1.42 (1.20–1.68) Hyperopia was defined as SER error ≥+2.00 D

McKean-Cowdin et al. [15] 2011 USA NA 6 to 72 m Refractive error: astigmatism 859 7720 Yes Adjusted for age, race, and spherical equivalent of the right eye 0.98 (0.65–1.47) Astigmatism was defined using a threshold level of cylindrical refractive error in the right or left eye of ≥1.50 D expressed in positive correcting cylinder form

Stone et al. [8] 2006 USA NA 8.7 ± 4.4 y Refractive error: myopia 63 279 Yes No 0.34 (0.08–1.50) Myopia was defined as a spherical equivalent refraction of ≤−0.5 D for the mean of both eyes

Pai et al. [16] 2012 Australia 2007–2009 6–72 m Amblyopia 27 1395 Yes Adjustments for age, gender, ethnicity, and SER 1.41 (0.26–7.69) Amblyopia was defined using the MEPEDS criteria and divided into unilateral and bilateral subtypes

Chia et al. [17] 2013 Singapore 2006–2009 30–72 m Amblyopia 20 1662 Yes No 1.31 (0.08–22.08) Unilateral amblyopia was defined as a 2-line difference between eyes with VA < 20/30 in the worse eye; bilateral amblyopia was defined as VA in both eyes < 20/40

Robaei et al. [18] 2006 Australia 2003-2004 6 years old Amblyopia 32 1733 Yes No 2.20 (1.00–5.00) Amblyopia was initially defined as corrected VA less than 0.3 logMAR units in the affected eye not attributable to any underlying structural abnormality of the eye or visual pathway plus a difference of at least 2 logMAR lines between the 2 eyes

Williams et al. [3] 2008 UK 1998–2000 NA Amblyopia 239 6696 No No 1.40 (1.04–1.86) Amblyopia was defined as those with a history of patching treatment and/or with an interocular difference in best acuity for each eye of 0.2 logMAR units where the worst-seeing eye had a best acuity of worse than 0.3 logMAR, and the eye looked normal on dilated funduscopy

Ip et al. [19] 2008 Australia NA 6 years old Refractive error: Hyperopia1 35 153 Yes No 1.50 (1.04–2.30) Hyperopia was defined as an SER of +0.50 D or greater and was stratified as mild or moderate
NA 12 years old Refractive error: Hyperopia2 22 282 Yes No 1.40 (0.90–2.30) Myopia was defined as an SER of −0.50 D or less

m: months; y: years; N1: with refractive error or amblyopia; N2: without refractive error and amblyopia; EVA: Electronic Visual Acuity; SPEDS: the Sydney Paediatric Eye Disease Study; SER: spherical equivalent refraction; MEPEDS: Multiethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study; D: diopters; VA: visual acuity.