Skip to main content
. 2016 May 9;2016:6817397. doi: 10.1155/2016/6817397

Table 4.

Group comparisons of fractional anisotropy (FA) in the respective corticospinal tracts (CST).

CST Ballet (n = 10) Handball (n = 12) Controls (n = 22) t (20) p d
M SD M SD M SD
HANDM1/R 0.4372 0.0264 0.4305 0.0206 0.4298 0.0275 0.66 0.516 0.30
HANDM1/L 0.4144 0.0287 0.4456 0.0210 0.4304 0.0256 −2.94 0.016 −1.32
HANDS1/R 0.4058 0.0238 0.4192 0.0365 0.4139 0.0423 −1.00 0.377 −0.45
HANDS1/L 0.3794 0.0237 0.4192 0.0206 0.4057 0.0252 −4.22 0.001 −1.89
FOOTM1/R 0.4252 0.0198 0.4408 0.0269 0.4301 0.0297 −1.52 0.230 −0.68
FOOTM1/L 0.3834 0.0186 0.4671 0.0222 0.4302 0.0386 −9.45 6.48E −8 −4.25
FOOTS1/R 0.3854 0.0304 0.4010 0.0234 0.4035 0.0239 −1.36 0.253 −0.61
FOOTS1/L 0.3586 0.0286 0.4561 0.0242 0.4132 0.0395 −8.68 1.28E −7 −3.89

Note. Differences were calculated between the two sports groups using unpaired t-tests (false discovery rate [FDR] corrected). Value within brackets represents degrees of freedom; d, effect size (Cohen's d); L, left hemisphere; M, mean; M1, primary motor cortex; n, number of subjects; p, error probability (two-tailed); R, right hemisphere; S1, primary somatosensory cortex; SD, standard deviation; t, t-value.