Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 28;32(24):2541–2552. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.1564

Table 1.

Selected Randomized Trials of Induction Chemotherapy for Older Patients With AML

Chemotherapy Regimen* Year Published Age Range (years) No. of Patients CR (%) OS
Induction Death Rate (%) Comments
Median (months) P
Intensive v supportive care
    Löwenberg et al7 1989 65-85 < .05 No difference in days hospitalized
        Cytarabine, daunorubicin, and vincristine 31 58 5.3 9.7
        Supportive care 29 0 2.8 NA
Type of anthracycline/dose intensification
    Löwenberg et al27 1998 61-88 .23
        Cytarabine plus daunomycin 242 38 9.0 6.0
        Cytarabine plus mitoxantrone 247 47 9.7 6.0
    Pautas et al29 2010 50-70 No difference .16 Median OS of 17 months for entire study cohort
        Cytarabine plus daunorubicin 80 mg/m2 156 70 8
        Cytarabine plus idarubacin 12 mg/m2 × 3 days 155 83 3
        Cytarabine plus idarubacin 12 mg/m2 × 4 days 157 78 6
    Löwenberg et al33 2009 60-83 No difference .16 OS benefits suggested in patients age 60-65 years
        Cytarabine plus daunorubicin 45 mg/m2 411 54 11
        Cytarabine plus daunorubicin 90 mg/m2 402 64 12
Dose-attenuated induction
    Tilly et al26 1990 65-83 .12
        Rubidazone plus cytarabine 46 52 12.8 31
        Low-dose cytarabine 41 32 8.8 10
Growth factor support
    Stone et al31 1995 60-80 .10
        Cytarabine plus daunorubicin 195 54 9.4 16
        Cytarabine, daunorubicin, and GM-CSF 193 51 9.4 20
MDR1 modulation
    Baer et al32 2002 60-84 No difference .48
        Cytarabine, daunorubicin, and etoposide 61 46 20
        Cytarabine, daunorubicin, etoposide, and PSC-833 59 39 44
Addition of sorafenib
    Serve et al30 2013 61-80 No difference .88 FLT3-ITD positive, 14%
        Cytarabine plus daunorubicin 60 mg/m2 97 60 7
        Cytarabine, daunorubicin 60 mg/m2, and sorafenib 104 48 17
Addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin
    Castaigne et al34 2012 50-70 < .05
        Cytarabine plus daunorubicin 139 75 11 4
        Cytarabine, daunorubicin, and gemtuzumab 139 81 28 6
    Burnett et al35 2012 51-84 .05 Improved 3-year survival: 25% v 20%
        Daunorubicin, cytarabine, or clofarabine 556 58 Improved 9
        Daunorubicin, cytarabine, or clofarabine plus gemtuzumab 559 65 8
Lower-intensity therapy
    Kantarjian et al36 2012 64-91 .2 Poor- or intermediate-risk cytogenetics only; ECOG PS 0-2 with minimal comorbid conditions
        Supportive care or low-dose cytarabine 243 8 5 8
        Decitabine 242 18 8 9
    Burnett et al37 2007 51-90 < .05 No specific fitness criteria except comorbidity if age < 70 years
        Low-dose cytarabine ± ATRA 103 18 Improved 26
        Hydroxyurea ± ATRA 99 1 26
    Burnett et al38 2013 51-90 No difference .7
        Clofarabine 200 22 18
        Low-dose cytarabine 206 12 13

Abbreviations: AML, acute myelogenous leukemia; ATRA, all-trans-retinoic acid; CR, complete remission; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; GM-CSF, granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating growth factor; NA, not applicable; OS, overall survival; PS, performance status.

*

One limitation in translating clinical trial data into best practice is lack of consistency in patient populations recruited and in drug doses used, making comparisons of results between trials challenging. To date, there are no older patient–specific dosing recommendations for many drugs based on physiologic changes of aging beyond adjustments for creatinine clearance when appropriate, cardiac function (ie, anthracyclines), and unacceptable toxicity risk (ie, high-dose cytarabine).

Age ≥ 80 years, 4%.

Rates represent CR with incomplete platelet count recovery.