Table 2.
Summary of CCO Quality Assessment of Included RCTs
| Criterion | Yes | No | Not Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Was allocation sequence reported? | 16 | 0 | 9 |
| Was concealed allocation reported? | 6 | 0 | 19 |
| Was sample size/power calculation reported? | 16 | 4 | 5 |
| Was blinding reported? | 16 | 6 | 3 |
| Was intention to treat reported? | 13 | 9 | 3 |
| Was patient withdrawal described? | 14 | 0 | 11 |
| Was industry funding reported? | 15 | 1 | 9 |
| Was loss to follow-up reported? | 13 | 0 | 12 |
| Were baseline characteristics balanced? | 17 | 3 | 5 |
| Was trial terminated early? | 7 | 18 | 0 |
NOTE. In assessment of quality, “yes” indicates that quality metric was met and/or was specifically reported, whereas “no” indicates that quality metric was not met. “Not reported” indicates that quality metric may or may not have been met; however, because it was not reported, it was not possible to assess.
Abbreviations: CCO, Cancer Care Ontario; RCT, randomized controlled trial.