Skip to main content
. 2016 May 23;3(3):031410. doi: 10.1117/1.NPh.3.3.031410

Table 1.

Sensitivity, specificity, and FPR are shown for varying CNRs for the proposed algorithm using p^<0.05 as the threshold for activation. Specificity is equal to 1 — FPR. Sensitivity is equal to the true positive rate. The offline results for the full 5 min of simulation from the OLS and AR-IRLS models are also presented.

  Kalman model AR-OLS AR-IRLS
1 min 2 min 3 min 4 min 5 min 5 min 5 min
Sensitivity | True positive rate
SNR=0.5 10.8% 28.4% 40.1% 49.3% 56.0% 21.2% 43.5%
SNR=1.0 29.5% 57.7% 71.6% 79.4% 84.0% 40.4% 80.2%
SNR=2.0 57.9% 82.6% 91.7% 95.1% 96.5% 65.5% 94.5%
Specificity
SNR=0.5 97.6% 97.9% 97.4% 97.3% 97.2% 91.3% 98.3%
SNR=1.0 97.6% 97.7% 97.3% 97.3% 97.1% 88.2% 98.3%
SNR=2.0 97.5% 97.7% 97.3% 97.3% 97.2% 88.4% 98.5%
False positive rate
SNR=0.5 2.4% 2.1% 2.6% 2.7% 2.8% 8.7% 1.7%
SNR=1.0 2.5% 2.3% 2.7% 2.7% 2.9% 11.8% 1.7%
SNR=2.0 2.5% 2.3% 2.7% 2.7% 2.8% 11.6% 1.5%