Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 23.
Published in final edited form as: Nano Res. 2016 Mar 4;9(5):1393–1408. doi: 10.1007/s12274-016-1035-8

Table 1.

Binding of N1-, N3-, Iso1-, and Iso3-HSA to different integrins as measured by a competitive binding assay using a CisoDGRC-HRP conjugate

Competitor Competitive binding (Ki a values in nM) to

αvβ3
αvβ5
αvβ6
αvβ8
α5β1
n b Ki n Ki n Ki n Ki n Ki
N1-HSA 1 >3,000 c       nd d nd nd nd
N1-HSA (37 °C) e 2 3.9 ± 0.9 nd nd nd nd
N3-HSA 1 >3,000 nd nd nd nd
N3-HSA (37 °C) 2 6.1 ± 1.9 nd nd nd nd
Iso1-HSA 6 4.8 ± 0.9
(1) f
3 25.5 ± 5.6
(5.3)
4 1,445 ± 666
(301)
2 29,086 ± 1875
(6059)
3 172 ± 29
(36)
Iso3-HSA 3 4.7 ± 1.8
(1)
2 7.1 ± 1.6
(1.5)
3 127 ± 43
(27)
4 116 ± 4
(25)
3 39 ± 5.1
(8.3)
*HSA 1 >10,000 1 >10,000 1 >10,000 1 >10,000 1 >10,000
a

Ki, equilibrium dissociation constant of the competitor (mean ± SE). Ki was determined using a competitive binding assay as described previously [24].

b

n, number of independent experiments (each in duplicate).

c

>, maximum concentration tested that had no inhibitory effect.

d

nd, not determined.

e

37 °C, the conjugate was incubated overnight at 37 °C in 0.1 M ammonium bicarbonate buffer, pH 8.5, to favor NGR-to-isoDGR conversion.

f

Relative values to αvβ3 Ki.