Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 23.
Published in final edited form as: Trop Med Int Health. 2014 Jul 24;19(10):1185–1197. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12360

Table 5.

Adjusted estimates of absence by intervention group, assessing all pupils collectively and stratifying by sex

Parameter All pupils
Boys
Girls
Proportion absence 95% CI p-value Proportion absence 95% CI p-value Proportion absence 95% CI p-value
All pupils
 Control 0.126 0.101 0.150 0.126 0.098 0.155 0.125 0.101 0.150    
 HW vs. control −0.003 −0.031 0.025 0.83 0.001 −0.031 0.028 0.93 −0.005 −0.033 0.023     0.73
 HW+LC vs. control 0.001 −0.024 0.026 0.94 −0.001 −0.028 0.029 0.97 0.001 −0.024 0.027     0.91
Grades 1–3
 Control 0.140 0.105 0.175 0.131 0.085 0.178 0.15005 0.111 0.189
 HW vs. control 0.014 −0.016 0.044 0.34 0.028 −0.004 0.060 0.09 0.001109 −0.033 0.035 0.95
 HW+LC vs. control 0.020 −0.012 0.051 0.22 0.033 −0.003 0.069 0.08 0.006336 −0.029 0.042 0.72
Grades 4–7
 Control 0.140 0.106 0.173 0.151 0.109 0.194 0.129 0.095 0.163    
 HW vs. control −0.018 −0.047 0.011 0.22 −0.020 −0.054 0.014 0.24 −0.016 −0.045 0.012     0.25
 HW+LC vs. control −0.009 −0.037 0.019 0.53 −0.017 −0.048 0.014 0.28 −0.001 −0.030 0.029     0.96
Grade 8
 Control 0.067 0.036 0.098 0.079 0.044 0.113 0.050 0.011 0.088    
 HW vs. control 0.020 −0.040 0.080 0.50 −0.007 −0.052 0.038 0.76 0.062 −0.030 0.153     0.18
 HW+LC vs. control −0.013 −0.046 0.019 0.41 −0.018 −0.050 0.014 0.26 −0.008 −0.059 0.044     0.77