Table 1.
Measures of test performance between the STK11 signature and detected DNA variation in TCGA and the MLOS cohorts
| Detected DNA Variation |
Signature Prediction |
N | Class | Metric | Value | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCGA | |||||||
| Mutant | STK11+ | 71 | TP (True Positives) | Sensitivity | 0.947 | (0.869, 0.985) | |
| Mutant | WT | 4 | FN (False Negatives) | Specificity | 0.732 | (0.686, 0.77) | |
| WT | STK11+ | 109 | FP (False Positives) | Precision | 0.394 | (0.322, 0.469) | |
| WT | WT | 298 | TN (True Negatives) | NPV (Negative Predictive Value) | 0.987 | (0.966, 0.996) | |
| False Positive Rate | 0.268 | (0.22, 0.313) | |||||
| False Discovery Rate | 0.606 | (0.53, 0.677) | |||||
| MLOS | |||||||
| Mutant | STK11+ | 66 | TP (True Positives) | Sensitivity | 0.971 | (0.897, 0.996) | |
| Mutant | WT | 2 | FN (False Negatives) | Specificity | 0.741 | (0.693, 0.784) | |
| WT | STK11+ | 97 | FP (False Positives) | Precision | 0.405 | (0.328, 0.484) | |
| WT | WT | 277 | TN (True Negatives) | NPV (Negative Predictive Value) | 0.993 | (0.974, 0.999) | |
| False Positive Rate | 0.259 | (0.215, 0.306) | |||||
| False Discovery Rate | 0.595 | (0.515, 0.671) |