Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 28.
Published in final edited form as: J Appl Gerontol. 2015 Apr 28;36(6):667–691. doi: 10.1177/0733464815581485

Table 4.

Factors associated with Discrepancy in Reports of Importance of Growth Activities for Nursing Home Residents between Residents and their Family Members

MODEL 1 MODEL 2 MODEL 3

B SE B SE B SE
Fixed effect
 Intercept (mean) 55.12*** 0.72 54.45*** 0.76 40.13*** 3.42
 Slope (discrepancy)a -4.62*** 1.05 -4.92*** 1.16 -9.42 5.24
Predictors of mean
Family Characteristics
  Family Race -- -- 5.69** 1.99 4.14* 1.93
  Family Involvement -- -- -- -- 0.47 0.25
Resident Characteristics
  Resident hearing -- -- -- -- 1.88 1.54
  Resident Personality: Conscientiousness -- -- -- -- -- --
  Resident Personality: Openness -- -- -- -- 0.17* 0.11
  Resident Positive Affect -- -- -- -- 0.32*** 0.09
Predictors of discrepancy
Family Characteristics
  Family Race -- -- 2.70 3.04 0.56 2.95
  Family Involvement -- -- -- -- 0.75 0.39
Resident Characteristics
  Resident hearing -- -- -- -- -7.08** 2.35
  Resident Personality: Conscientiousness -- -- -- -- -- --
  Resident Personality: Openness -- -- -- -- 0.52*** 0.16
  Resident Positive Affect -- -- -- -- -0.25 0.14
Random effect
 Variance (mean) 20.97** 7.70 16.80* 7.39 13.46* 6.20
 Residual 46.45*** 7.17 47.47*** 7.47 38.16*** 6.27
-2 Log Likelihood 1184.6 1142.0 1062.4
AIC 1188.6 1146.1 1066.4

Note. N = 85 dyads of a resident and family/friend proxy.

p <.10

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.