Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016 Dec;69(12):2431–2451. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1121282

Table 2.

Mean (standard deviation) performance on shifting measures by age and condition. More negative rate residual scores indicate larger switch costs.

Response times Error rates Rate residual scores
Global switch costs
  Age Pure Mixed RT cost Pure Mixed Error cost Global Cost
  Young 487 (83) 1109 (257) 622 (214) .03 (.03) .04 (.04) .01 (.03) 0.06 (0.80)
  Old 732 (189) 1715 (652) 983 (546) .02 (.02) .04 (.06) .03 (.06) −0.10 (0.93)
Local switch costs
  Age Repeat Switch RT cost Repeat Switch Error cost Local Cost
  Young 717 (154) 800 (161) 82 (94) .04 (.04) .05 (.05) .01 (.05) 0.01 (0.62)
N-2 repetition costs
  Age N-2 switch
(CBA)
N-2 repeat
(ABA)
RT cost N-2 switch
(CBA)
N-2 repeat
(ABA)
Error cost N-2 Repetition Cost
  Young 1084 (263) 1137 (260) 53 (71) .04 (.04) .04 (.04) .003 (.02) 0.14 (0.45)
  Old 1670 (645) 1764 (663) 94 (102) .04 (.06) .05 (.06) .01 (.02) −0.22 (0.38)