Table 4.
Intercorrelations between shifting variables (rate residual scores), control composite scores, and age. More negative rate residual scores indicate larger switch costs.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Global costs | - | .57* | 0.38* | −0.07 | −0.09 | 0.26* | −0.09 |
| 2. Local costs | - | - | .12 | .06 | −.17 | .18 | - |
| 3. N-2 repetition costs | - | - | - | −0.07 | −0.25* | 0.26* | −0.38* |
| 4. Response-distractor inhibition composite | - | - | - | - | 0.22* | −0.27* | 0.30* |
| 5. Resistance to PI composite | - | - | - | - | - | −0.35* | 0.61* |
| 6. WM composite | - | - | - | - | - | - | −0.40* |
| 7. Age (dichotomous) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
*
p ≤ .005
Note. For the cells shaded in gray, n = 94 young adults.