Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016 Dec;69(12):2431–2451. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1121282

Table A1.

regression analyses using RT and error difference scores

Response times
Cost Predictor B S.E. B β p
Global switch costs Age 225.88 76.59 .28 .004*
Inhibition −31.75 46.89 −.05 .50
Resistance to PI 57.93 52.38 .10 .27
WM −155.26 40.47 −.29 < .001*
Local switch costs Inhibition −12.15 20.08 −.06 .55
Resistance to PI 38.02 22.78 .18 .10
WM −.73 15.14 −.01 .96
N-2 repetition costs Age 50.93 17.87 .29 .005*
Inhibition −14.96 10.94 −.11 .17
Resistance to PI −14.98 12.22 −.12 .22
WM −12.66 9.44 −.12 .18
Error rates
Cost Predictor B S.E. B β p
Global switch costs Age −.004 .009 −.05 .63
Inhibition −.002 .006 −.02 .77
Resistance to PI .01 .006 .19 .052
WM −.01 .005 −.21 .01*
Local switch costs Inhibition −.01 .01 −.10 .34
Resistance to PI .01 .01 .10 .35
WM −.009 .008 −.13 .23
N-2 repetition costs Age .000 .005 −.009 .93
Inhibition .001 .003 .04 .66
Resistance to PI .009 .003 .25 .01*
WM .004 .003 .14 .12
*

p < .05

Note. S.E. = standard error